Azad Engineering makes high-precision forged and machined airfoils, blades, engine assemblies and actuators sold to GE Aviation, Honeywell, Eaton, Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Pratt & Whitney and others — alongside a larger Energy and Oil & Gas business (GE, Mitsubishi, Siemens as customers there) that, per available disclosure, still generates roughly 80% of revenue. CARE Ratings' independent assessment places Azad among just four global players in its particular niche, with PBILDT margins consistently above 25% (39.09% in FY26) and a ₹6,500 crore order book — a genuinely rare capability set.
The concern is entirely about price, not the business. At a trailing P/E of 132x, Azad already trades above every disclosed analyst target this research could find: S&P Global's consensus of seven analysts averaged ₹2,534, Univest's most recent published target was ₹2,550, and Trendlyne's two-analyst average was ₹1,900 — all below the ₹2,849 the stock traded at in this research. Working capital has also elongated materially (344 days in FY26 versus 287 in FY25) and gearing nearly doubled (0.18x to 0.30x) funding new capacity.
Net: SELL, anchored to the disclosed sell-side consensus rather than an independently constructed multiple, since genuine analyst coverage exists here and largely agrees the stock is ahead of itself.
Azad Engineering is a full main-board listed company under standard SEBI LODR obligations, following its December 2023 IPO.
The board carries 4 independent directors on 8 members (50%), including two women directors. The statutory auditor transitioned from a partnership to an LLP structure (M S K A & Associates LLP, January 2026) while retaining the same ICAI registration and audit relationship — a clean, continuous transition rather than a disruptive change. A ₹700cr QIP (February-March 2025) was executed at only a 1.77% discount to the floor price, a reasonably tight pricing outcome.
The Chairman also holds the CEO title — a combined role some governance codes prefer to separate, even where, as here, a separate Managing Director (Murali Raju, non-family) provides some operational counterbalance. Contradictory third-party characterisations of the company's governance quality (one aggregator's "red" forensic-screen verdict versus another's "clean regulatory record" claim) could not be resolved against a primary filing in this research and are reported as an open question, not settled either way.
A BRSR-disclosed ₹11.49 lakh GST penalty for FY2019-20/2020-21 is minor and administrative in nature. Beyond that, no confirmed SEBI enforcement action or material litigation was found — but given the unresolved, contradictory secondary-source claims noted above, we do not treat this as a clean bill of health without a primary-filing check.
Resolution of the contradictory governance-screen claims against a primary filing; confirmation of promoter pledge status directly from a BSE encumbrance filing; working-capital-cycle trend in FY27.
Adequate on the disclosed record, with one open question this report could not close. The combined Chairman/CEO role and the unresolved third-party governance-screen dispute belong in the discount rate alongside the valuation concerns already driving this report's SELL call.
Genuine sell-side coverage exists for Azad, and it clusters below the current price. We anchor to that disclosed consensus rather than construct an independent multiple:
| Source | Target price | Dated |
|---|---|---|
| S&P Global consensus (7 analysts) | 2,534 | Sept 2026 |
| Univest | 2,550 | June 2026 |
| Trendlyne (2 analysts) | 1,900 | Feb 2026 |
| Average | 2,328 | — |
We set our target at the more recent, larger-sample S&P Global consensus figure (₹2,534) rather than the simple average, since it is both the most current and the broadest-sampled data point found.
Upgrade triggers: working-capital-cycle normalisation; confirmed resolution of the governance- screen dispute in the company's favour; aerospace share of revenue rising materially while margins hold. Downgrade triggers: further gearing increases without a working-capital improvement; any adverse finding on the disputed governance claims; energy/O&G demand weakness given its dominant revenue share.
| FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 252 | 341 | 457 | 603 |
| PBILDT margin | 29% | 34% | 36.2% | 39.1% |
| PAT | 8 | 59 | 88.5 | 132.2 |
| Gearing | — | — | 0.18x | 0.30x |
| Working capital days | — | — | 287 | 344 |
Source: CARE Ratings press release (22 Jun 2026, full text); screener.in (11 Sep 2026); S&P Global/Univest/Trendlyne consensus trackers (secondary aggregation, not independently verified against original broker notes).
Dart Consultants is a market intelligence and technology service provider, not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. This report is educational material only — not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock. The SELL rating above is an educational device for summarising public information, not a regulated recommendation. The analyst(s) hold no position in, and have no banking, advisory or brokerage relationship with, Azad Engineering Limited, and have received no compensation from the company.
| 12-month target | ₹2,534 |
| CMP (11 Sep 2026) | ₹2,849 |
| Implied downside | (11.1)% |
| Rating | SELL |
| Market cap | ₹18,400cr |
| P/E (TTM) | 132x |
| Book value/share | ₹237 |
| Credit rating | CARE A; Stable |
| Promoter | 55.84% |
| FII | 13.30% |
| DII | 10.32% |
| Public | 20.53% |
| FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 341 | 457 | 603 |
| PBILDT margin | 34% | 36.2% | 39.1% |
| PAT | 59 | 88.5 | 132.2 |