PDF ↗
Dart ConsultantsDart HomeAI Compute StackDC Physical InfrastructureUnified: Wafer to SubstationAerospace ManufacturingPharma Excipients & Cellulosics
Home/Primer/The vocabulary
Section 1

The vocabulary

Three terms decide almost everything about who can compete where in this industry, and what they are allowed to earn for it. Learn these three and the rest of the value chain organises itself.

1. Build-to-print vs. risk-sharing partner

Build-to-print (BTP) means the OEM or Tier-1 hands a supplier a complete drawing, a named material specification and a defined process, and the supplier's job is to execute it exactly. The OEM has already done the hard engineering; the supplier is renting out precision and capacity, not judgement. A risk-sharing partnership (RSP) — sometimes called "black box" work — is the opposite: the supplier co-funds development, owns the process and often the tooling design, and in exchange keeps exclusive rights to supply that part for the life of the programme. Industry commentary on this split is blunt about the consequence: build-to-print suppliers sit "squeezed between material costs and OEM pricing pressure," while risk-sharing partners share in the programme's long-run profit — and its downside.

2. Special process (the Nadcap layer)

AS9100 is the aerospace industry's quality-management-system standard — a precondition for being taken seriously, roughly equivalent to a very strict ISO 9001. It says a company runs a disciplined factory. It says nothing about whether a specific process — a heat-treatment cycle, a weld, a coating, a non-destructive test — actually produces the metallurgical result an aircraft needs. That second, narrower certification is Nadcap (the National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program), and it accredits exactly those "special processes": heat treatment, welding, surface treatment, chemical processing and non-destructive testing. Almost every hard, high-margin step in this value chain is a Nadcap-accredited special process. As of an August 2026 reading of the Nadcap Qualified Manufacturers List, 51 Indian facilities hold Nadcap heat-treating accreditation alone, concentrated in Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra.

3. Qualified / on the Approved Supplier List

A part is not sold once it is made correctly; it is sold once a customer has added the exact supplier, at the exact facility, making that exact part number, to its Approved Supplier List. Getting there involves a First Article Inspection (FAI) — a full, one-time dimensional and characteristic check of the first production part, which industry guidance says typically takes two to six weeks by itself — followed by a Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) confirming the supplier can hold that standard at full production rate. The FAI must be repeated after almost any change: a new tool, a new process, a new manufacturing location, or a break in production of two years or more. None of this is what actually takes years; what takes years is everything around it — building an AS9100 quality system from scratch, earning Nadcap accreditation for every special process used, and a customer's own track-record requirements before it will commit real production volume to a new name.

TermWhat it actually certifiesWho typically holds itWhat it does NOT tell you
AS9100The quality-management system is disciplined and documentedNearly every serious aerospace supplier, including simple machine shopsWhether any specific process is metallurgically sound
NadcapOne named special process (heat-treat, NDT, weld, coating, chemical)A smaller, growing set of Indian facilities — 51 for heat-treat alone, Aug 2026Whether the company is approved to supply any particular customer's part
Approved Supplier ListThis exact part, this exact facility, is cleared for this exact customerAn even smaller set — won one program at a time, not once for the whole industryWhether that approval transfers to a sister plant, a new material batch, or a different customer

Source: Dart Consultants, from valencesurfacetech.com (AS9100 vs Nadcap), Nadcap Qualified Manufacturers List via Business Standard (17 Aug 2026), and standard FAI/PPAP industry guidance (openbom.com, qcadvisor.com, unitek-kiwa.com).

Rule of thumb

If a part's value comes from its geometry alone, assume it is build-to-print, assume Nadcap matters less than AS9100, and assume the margin is thin. If a part's value comes from what happened to its metallurgy — a heat-treat cycle, a coating, a weld joint that has to survive fatigue — assume Nadcap is the real gate, assume the customer relationship is sticky once won, and assume that is where this report's attention should go.

Educational material only — not investment advice. Dart Consultants is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst.